(c) 2023 PillSync.com

Generic: gemcitabine hydrochloride is used for the treatment of Breast Neoplasms Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Ovarian Neoplasms Pregnancy Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal


Go PRO for all pill images

Recent Major Changes



Warnings and Precautions, Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (5.4) Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā Ā  8/2019

1 Indications And Usage



Gemcitabine Injection is a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor indicated:
  • in combination with carboplatin, for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer that has relapsed at least 6 months after completion of platinum-based therapy. (1.1)
  • in combination with paclitaxel, for ļ¬rst-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior anthracycline containing adjuvant chemotherapy, unless anthracyclines were clinically contraindicated.Ā (1.2)
  • in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. (1.3)
  • as a single-agent for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. (1.4)

1.1 Ovarian Cancer


Gemcitabine Injection in combination with carboplatin is indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer that has relapsed at least 6 months after completion of platinum-based therapy.

1.2 Breast Cancer


Gemcitabine Injection in combination with paclitaxel is indicated for the ļ¬rst-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, unless anthracyclines were clinically contraindicated.

1.3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer


Gemcitabine Injection in combination with cisplatin is indicated for the ļ¬rst-line treatment of patients with inoperable, locally advanced (Stage IIIA or IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

1.4 Pancreatic Cancer


Gemcitabine Injection is indicated as ļ¬rst-line treatment for patients with locally advanced (nonresectable Stage II or Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Gemcitabine Injection is indicated for patients previously treated with ļ¬‚uorouracil.

2 Dosage And Administration



Gemcitabine Injection is for intravenous use only.
  • Ovarian Cancer: 1000Ā mg/mĀ² over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. (2.1)
  • Breast Cancer: 1250Ā mg/mĀ² over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. (2.2)
  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 1000Ā mg/mĀ² over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle or 1250Ā mg/mĀ² over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. (2.3)
  • Pancreatic Cancer: 1000Ā mg/mĀ² over 30 minutes once weekly for the ļ¬rst 7 weeks, then one-week rest, then once weekly for 3 weeks of each 28-day cycle. (2.4)

2.1 Ovarian Cancer


Recommended Dose and Schedule The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1000 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle, in combination with carboplatin AUC 4 administered intravenously on Day 1 after Gemcitabine Injection administration. Refer to carboplatin prescribing information for additional information.

Dosage Modiļ¬cations Recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection for myelosuppression are described in Tables 1 and Table 2Ā [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Table 1: Recommended Dosage Modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection for Myelosuppression on Day of Treatment in Ovarian Cancer

Treatment Day

Absolute Neutrophil Count (x 106/L)

Platelet Count (x 106/L)

Dosage Modification

Day 1

Greater than or equal to 1500

And

Greater than or equal to 100,000

None

Less than 1500

Or

Less than 100,000

Delay Treatment Cycle

Day 8

Greater than or equal to 1500

And

Greater than or equal to 100,000

None

Less than 1000

Or

75,000 to 99,999

50% of full dose

Less than 1000

Or

Less than 75,000

Hold

Table 2: Recommended Dosage Modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection for Myelosuppression in Previous Cycle in Ovarian Cancer

Occurrence

Myelosuppression During Treatment Cycle

Dosage Modification

Initial Occurrence

Absolute neutrophil count less than
  • 500 x 106/L for more than 5 days or
  • Absolute neutrophil count less than 100 x 106/L for more than 3 days or
  • Febrile neutropenia or
  • Platelets less than 25,000 x 106/L
  • Cycle delay for more than one week due to toxicity

Permanently reduce Gemcitabine Injection to 800 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8

Subsequent Occurrence

If any of the above toxicities occur after the initial dose reduction

Permanently reduce Gemcitabine Injection dose to 800 mg/m2 on Day 1 only

2.2 Breast Cancer


Recommended Dose and Schedule The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1250 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle in combination with paclitaxel 175 mg/mĀ² administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on Day 1 before Gemcitabine Injection administration. Refer to paclitaxel prescribing information for additional information

Dosage Modiļ¬cations Recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection for myelosuppression are described in Table 3 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Table 3: Recommended Dosage Modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection for Myelosuppression on Day of Treatment in Breast Cancer

Treatment Day

Absolute Neutrophil Count Ā (x 106/L)

Platelet Count

(x 106/L)

Dosage Modification

Day 1

Greater than or equal to 1500

And

Greater than or equal to 100,000

None

Less than 1500

Or

Less than 100,000

Hold

Day 8

Greater than or equal to 1200

And

Greater than 70,000

None

1000 to 1199

Or

50,000 to 75,000

75%Ā of full dose

700 to 999

And

Greater than or equal to 50,000

50% of full dose

Less than 700

Or

Less than 50,000

Hold

2.3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer


Recommended Dose and Schedule 28-day schedule The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1000 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle in combination with cisplatin 100 mg/mĀ² administered intravenously on Day 1 after Gemcitabine Injection administration.

21-day schedule The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1250 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle in combination with cisplatin 100 mg/mĀ² administered intravenously on Day 1 after Gemcitabine Injection administration.

Refer to cisplatin prescribing information for additional information.

Dosage Modiļ¬cations Recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection myelosuppression are described in Table 4 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)]. Refer to the recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

2.4 Pancreatic Cancer


Recommended Dose and Schedule The recommended dosage of Gemcitabine Injection is 1000 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes.The recommended treatment schedule is as follows:
  • Weeks 1 to 8: weekly dosing for the ļ¬rst 7 weeks followed by one-week rest.
  • After week 8: weekly dosing on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle.

Dosage Modifications Recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection for myelosuppression are described in Table 4Ā [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].Ā Refer to the recommended dosage modiļ¬cations for non-hematologic adverse reactions [see Dosage and Administration (2.5)].

Table 4: Recommended Dosage Modiļ¬cations for Gemcitabine Injection for Myelosuppression in Pancreatic Cancer and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Absolute Neutrophil Count Ā (x 106/L)

Platelet Count

(x 106/L)

Dosage Modification

Greater than or equal to 1000

And

Greater than or equal to 100,000

None

500 to 999

Or

50,000 to 99,999

75% of full dose

Less than 500

Or

Less than 50,000

Hold

2.5 Dosage Modications for Non-Hematologic Adverse Reactions


Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection for any of the following

Withhold Gemcitabine Injection or reduce dose by 50% for other Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse reactions until resolved. No dose modiļ¬cations are recommended for alopecia, nausea, or vomiting.

2.6 Preparation


Gemcitabine Injection is a cytotoxic drug. Follow applicable special handling and disposal proceduresĀ¹. Exercise caution and wear gloves when preparing Gemcitabine Injection solutions. Immediately wash the skin thoroughly or rinse the mucosa with copious amounts of water if Gemcitabine Injection contacts the skin or mucus membranes. Death has occurred in animal studies due to dermal absorption.

Preparation for Intravenous Infusion Administration
  • Withdraw the calculated dose from the vial and discard any unused portion.
  • Prior to administration, dilute the appropriate amount of drug with 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection to a minimum ļ¬nal concentration of at least 0.1 mg/mL
  • Store diluted Gemcitabine Injection solution for no more than 24 hours at controlled room temperature of 20Ā° to 25Ā°C (68Ā° to 77Ā°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature]. Discard if not used within 24 hours after dilution.
  • Visually inspect for particulate matter or discoloration prior to administration and discard if particulate matter or discoloration is observed.
  • No incompatibilities have been observed with infusion bottles or polyvinyl chloride bags and administration sets.

3 Dosage Forms And Strengths


Injection: 200 mg/5.26 mL (38 mg/mL), 1 g/26.3 mL (38 mg/mL), and 2 g/52.6 mL (38 mg/mL) as a clear and colorless to light straw-colored solution in a single-dose vial.


Injection: 200 mg/5.26 mL (38 mg/mL), 1 g/26.3 mL (38 mg/mL), or 2 g/52.6 mL (38 mg/mL) in a single-dose vial. (3)

4 Contraindications


Gemcitabine Injection is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to gemcitabine. Reactions include anaphylaxis [see Adverse Reactions (6. 1)].


Patients with a known hypersensitivity to gemcitabineĀ (4)

5 Warnings And Precautions


  • Schedule-Dependent Toxicity: Increased toxicity with infusion time greater than 60 minutes or dosing more frequently than once weekly.Ā (5.1)
  • Myelosuppression: Monitor for myelosuppression prior to each cycle and reduce or withhold dose for severe myelosuppression. (5.2, 5.7)
  • Pulmonary Toxicity and Respiratory Failure: Discontinue Gemcitabine Injection for unexplained dyspnea or other evidence of severe pulmonary toxicity. (5.3)
  • Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome (HUS): Monitor renal function prior to initiation and during treatment. Discontinue Gemcitabine Injection for HUS or severe renal impairment. (5.4)
  • Hepatic Toxicity: Monitor hepatic function prior to initiation and during therapy. Discontinue Gemcitabine Injection for severe hepatic toxicity. (5.5)
  • Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: Can cause fetal harm. Advise females and males of reproductive potential to use effective contraception.Ā (5.6, 8.1)
  • Exacerbation of Radiation Therapy Toxicity: May cause severe and life threatening toxicity when administered during or within 7 days of radiation therapy. (5.7)
  • Capillary Leak Syndrome: Discontinue Gemcitabine Injection.Ā (5.8)
  • Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Discontinue Gemcitabine Injection.Ā (5.9)

5.1 Schedule-Dependent Toxicity


In clinical trials evaluating the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine, prolongation of the infusion time beyond 60 minutes or more frequent than weekly dosing resulted in an increased incidence of clinically signiļ¬cant hypotension, severe ļ¬‚u-like symptoms, myelosuppression, and asthenia. The half-life of gemcitabine is inļ¬‚uenced by the length of the infusionĀ [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].Ā Refer to the recommended Gemcitabine Injection dosage [see Dosage and Administration (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4)].

5.2 Myelosuppression


Myelosuppression manifested by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, occurs with gemcitabine as a singleagent and the risks are increased when gemcitabine is combined with other cytotoxic drugs. In clinical trials, Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 25%, 8%, and 5%, respectively of the 979 patients who received single agent gemcitabine. The frequencies of Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia varied from 48% toĀ 71%, 8% to 28%, and 5% to 55%, respectively, in patients receiving gemcitabine in combination with another drug [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

Prior to each dose of Gemcitabine Injection, obtain a complete blood count (CBC) with a differential and a platelet count. Modify the dosage as recommended [see Dosage and Administration (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4)].

5.3 Pulmonary Toxicity and Respiratory Failure


Pulmonary toxicity, including interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary ļ¬brosis, pulmonary edema, and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has been reported. In some cases, these pulmonary events can lead to fatal respiratory failure despite the discontinuation of therapy. The onset of pulmonary symptoms may occur up to 2 weeks after the last dose of gemcitabine [see Adverse Reactions (6.1, 6.2)].

Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection in patients who develop unexplained dyspnea, with or without bronchospasm, or evidence of severe pulmonary toxicity.

5.4 Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome


Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), including fatalities from renal failure or the requirement for dialysis, can occur with gemcitabine. In clinical trials, HUS occurred in 0.25% of 2429 patients. Most fatal cases of renal failure were due to HUS [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)]. Serious cases of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) other than HUS have been reported with gemcitabine [see Adverse Reactions (6.2)].

Assess renal function prior to initiation of Gemcitabine Injection and periodically during treatment. Consider the diagnosis of HUS in patients who develop anemia with evidence of microangiopathic hemolysis, increased bilirubin or LDH, or reticulocytosis; severe thrombocytopenia; or evidence of renal failure (increased serum creatinine or BUN). Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection in patients with HUS or severe renal impairment. Renal failure may not be reversible even with the discontinuation of therapy.

5.5 Hepatic Toxicity


Drug-induced liver injury, including liver failure and death, has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine alone or with other potentially hepatotoxic drugs [see Adverse Reactions (6.1, 6.2)].Ā Administration of gemcitabine in patients with concurrent liver metastases or a pre-existing medical history of hepatitis, alcoholism, or liver cirrhosis can lead to exacerbation of the underlying hepatic insufļ¬ciency.

Assess hepatic function prior to initiation of Gemcitabine Injection and periodically during treatment. Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection in patients who develop severe hepatic toxicity.

5.6 Embryo-Fetal Toxicity


Based on animal data and its mechanism of action Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Gemcitabine was teratogenic, embryotoxic, and fetotoxic in mice and rabbits. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.

Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 6 months after the ļ¬nal dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 3 months following the ļ¬nal dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1), (8.3)].

5.7 Exacerbation of Radiation Therapy Toxicity


Gemcitabine is not recommended for use in combination with radiation therapy.

Concurrent (given together or ā‰¤7 days apart) Life-threatening mucositis, especially esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in a trial in which gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/mĀ² to patients with non-small cell lung cancer for up to 6 consecutive weeks concurrently with thoracic radiation.

Non-concurrent (given >7 days apart) Excessive toxicity has not been observed when gemcitabine is administered more than 7 days before or after radiation. Radiation recall has been reported in patients who received gemcitabine after prior radiation.

5.8 Capillary Leak Syndrome


Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) with severe consequences has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents [See Adverse Reactions (6.2)]. Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection if CLS develops during therapy.

5.9 Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome


Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) has been reported in patients receiving gemcitabine as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents [See Adverse Reactions (6.2)]. PRES can present with headache, seizure, lethargy, hypertension, confusion, blindness, and other visual and neurologic disturbances. Conļ¬rm the diagnosis of PRES with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Permanently discontinue Gemcitabine Injection if PRES develops during therapy.

6 Adverse Reactions


The following clinically signiļ¬cant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labelling:


The most common adverse reactions for the single agent (ā‰„20%) are nausea/ vomiting, anemia, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), neutropenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, proteinuria, fever, hematuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, dyspnea and edema. (6.1)

To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact at 1-888-557-1212 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch .


6.1 Clinical Trials Experience


Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reļ¬‚ect the rates observed in practice.

Single Agent The data described below reļ¬‚ect exposure to gemcitabine as a single agent administered at doses between 800 mg/mĀ² to 1250 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly, in 979 patients with various malignancies. The most common (20%) adverse reactions of single-agent gemcitabine are nausea/vomiting, anemia, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), neutropenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, proteinuria, fever, hematuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, dyspnea, and edema. The most common (5%) Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were neutropenia, nausea/vomiting; increased ALT, increased alkaline phosphatase, anemia, increased AST, and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 10% of the 979 patients discontinued gemcitabine due to adverse reactions. Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine in 2% of 979 patients were cardiovascular adverse reactions (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, and hypertension) and adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine in <1% of 979 patients were anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, rash, dyspnea, hemorrhage, infection, stomatitis, somnolence, ļ¬‚u-like syndrome, and edema.

Tables 5 and 6 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities reported in patients with various malignancies receiving single-agent gemcitabine across 5 clinical trials. Additional clinically signiļ¬cant adverse reactions are provided following Table 6.

Table 5: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Single-Agent Gemcitabinea
Ā Adverse Reactionsb
Gemcitabinec

All Grades (%)

Grade 3 (%)

Grade 4 (%)

Nausea and Vomiting

69

13

1

Fever

41

2

0

Rash

30

<1

0

Dyspnea

23

3

<1

Diarrhea

19

1

0

Hemorrhage

17

<1

<1

Infection

16

1

<1

Alopecia

15

<1

0

Stomatitis

11

<1

0

Somnolence

11

<1

<1

Paresthesias

10

<1

0

aGrade based on criteria form the world Health Organization (WHO) b For approximately 60% of patients, non-laboratory adverse events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related cN=699-974; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.

Table 6: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Single Agent Gemcitabine a
Laboratory Abnormalityb
Gemcitabinec

All Grades (%)

Grade 3Ā (%)

Grade 4Ā (%)

Hematologic

Ā  Anemia

68

7

1

Ā  Neutropenia

63

19

6

Ā  Thrombocytopenia

24

4

1

Hepatic

Ā  Increased ALT

68

8

2

Ā  Increased AST

67

6

2

Ā  Increased Alkaline Phosphatase
55 7 2

Ā  Hyperbilirubinemia

13

2

<1

Renal

Ā  Proteinuria

45

<1

0

Ā  Hematuria
35 Ā <1 0

Ā  Increased BUN

16

0

0

Ā  Increased Creatinine

8

<1

0

aGrade based on criteria from WHO.

bRegardless of causality. cN=699-974; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.

Additional adverse reactions include the following:
  • Transfusion requirements: Red blood cell transfusions (19%); platelet transfusions (<1%)
  • Edema: Edema (13%), peripheral edema (20%), and generalized edema (<1%).
  • Flu-like Symptoms: Fever, asthenia, anorexia, headache, cough, chills, myalgia, insomnia, rhinitis, sweating, and/or malaise (19%).
  • Infection: Sepsis (<1%).
  • Extravasation: Injection-site reactions (4%).
  • Allergic: Bronchospasm (<2%); anaphylactoid reactions.

Tables 7 and 8 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ā‰„10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine/carboplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 1) of gemcitabine with carboplatin (n=175) compared to carboplatin alone (n=174) for the second-line treatment of ovarian cancer in women with disease that had relapsed more than 6 months following ļ¬rst-line platinum-based chemotherapy [see Clinical Studies (14.1)].

Additional clinically signiļ¬cant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following Table 8.

The proportion of patients with dose adjustments for carboplatin (1.8% versus 3.8%), doses of carboplatin omitted (0.2% versus 0) and discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (11% versus 10%), were similar between arms. Dose adjustment for gemcitabine occurred in 10% of patients and gemcitabine dose was omitted in 14% of patients in the gemcitabine/carboplatin arm.

Table 7: Adverse Reactions Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ā‰„5% (All Grades) or ā‰„2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1a
Adverse Reactionsb
Gemcitabine/Carboplatin

(N=175)

Carboplatin

(N=174)

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)

All Grades (%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)

Nausea

69

6

0

61

3

0

Alopecia

49

0

0

17

0

0

Vomiting

46

6

0

36

2

<1

Constipation

42

6

1

37

3

0

Fatigue

40

3

<1

32

5

0

Diarrhea

25

3

0

14

<1

0

Stomatitis/Pharyngitis

22

<1

0

13

0

0

aGrade based on criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO). bRegardless of causality.

Table 8: Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ā‰„5% (All Grades) or ā‰„2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1a
Laboratory Abnormalityb
Gemcitabine/Carboplatin

(N=175)

Carboplatin

(N=174)

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)

Hematologic

Ā  Neutropenia

90

42

29

58

11

1

Ā  Anemia

86

22

6

75

9

2

Ā  Thrombocytopenia

78

30

5

57

10

1

Ā  RBC Transfusionc

38

-

-

15

-

-

Ā  Platelet Transfusionc

9

-

-

3

-

-

a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0. b Regardless of causality. c Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Transfusions are not CTC-graded events. Blood transfusions included both packed red blood cells and whole blood.

Hematopoietic growth factors were administered more frequently in the gemcitabine-containing arm: leukocyte growth factor (24% and 10%) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (7% and 3.9%).

The following clinically relevant, Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the gemcitabine with carboplatin arm: dyspnea (3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic event (2.3% versus 1.1%), motor neuropathy (1.1% versus 0.6%), and rash/ desquamation (0.6% versus 0). Breast Cancer.

Tables 9 and 10 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in >10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine/paclitaxel arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 2) of gemcitabine with paclitaxel (n=262) compared to paclitaxel alone (n=259) for the ļ¬rst-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in women who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting or for whom anthracyclines were contraindicated [see Clinical Studies (14.2)]. Additional clinically signiļ¬cant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following Table 10.

The requirement for dose reduction of paclitaxel were higher for patients in the gemcitabine/paclitaxel arm (5% versus 2%).

The number of paclitaxel doses omitted (<1%), the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (7% versus 5%) and the number of treatment-related deaths (1 patient in each arm) were similar between the two arms.

Table 9: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel [Between Arm Difference of ā‰„5% (All Grades) or ā‰„2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2a
Ā Adverse Reactionsb
Gemcitabine/Paclitaxel

(N=262)

Paclitaxel(N=259)

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)

Alopecia
90 14 4 92 19 3

Neuropathy-Sensory

64

5

<1

58

3

0

NauseaĀ 

50

1

0

31

2

0

Fatigue

40

6

<1

28

1
<1

VomitingĀ 

29
2 0
15
2 0

DiarrheaĀ 

20
3 0
13
2 0

Anorexia
17 0 0 12 <1 0

Neuropathy-MotorĀ 

15

2

<1

10

<1

0

Stomatitis/PharyngitisĀ 

13

1

<1

8

<1

0

Fever

13

<1

0

3

0

0

Rash/DesquamationĀ 

11

<1

<1

5

0

0

Febrile Neutropenia

6

0

<1

2

1

0

a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0. b Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related.

Table 10: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel and at a Higher Incidence than Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel [Between Arm Difference of ā‰„5% (All Grades) or ā‰„2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2a
Laboratory Abnormalityb
Ā Gemcitabine/ Paclitaxel

(N=262)Ā 

Ā Ā Paclitaxel

(N=259)Ā 

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)Ā 

Grade 4

(%)Ā 

All Grades

(%)Ā 

Ā Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)
Hematologic
Anemia 69 6 1 51 3 <1
Neutropenia 69 31Ā  17 31 4Ā  7
Thrombocytopenia 26 5Ā  <1 7 <1 <1Ā 
Hepatobiliary
Increased ALT 18 5 <1 6 <1 0
Increased AST 16 2 0 5 <1 0

a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0. b Regardless of causality.

Clinically relevant Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea occurred with a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with paclitaxel arm compared with the paclitaxel arm (1.9% versus 0).

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tables 11 and 12 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ā‰„10% of gemcitabine treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 3) of gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=260) administered in 28-day cycles as compared to cisplatin alone (n=262) in patients receiving ļ¬rst-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [see Clinical Studies (14.3)].

Patients randomized to gemcitabine with cisplatin received a median of 4 cycles of treatment and those randomized to cisplatin alone received a median of 2 cycles of treatment. In this trial, the requirement for dose adjustments (>90% versus 16%), discontinuation of treatment for adverse reactions (15% versus 8%), and the proportion of patients hospitalized (36% versus 23%) were all higher for patients receiving gemcitabine with cisplatin compared to those receiving cisplatin alone. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% versus <1%), sepsis (4% versus 1%), Grade 3 cardiac dysrhythmias (3% versus <1%) were all higher in the gemcitabine / cisplatin arm compared to the cisplatin alone arm. The two-drug combination was more myelosuppressive with 4 (1.5%) possibly treatment-related deaths, including 3 resulting from myelosuppression with infection and one case of renal failure associated with pancytopenia and infection. No deaths due to treatment were reported on the cisplatin arm.

Table 11: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ā‰„5% (All Grades) or ā‰„2% (Grades 3-4)]a in Study 3a
Adverse Reactionsb Ā Gemcitabine plus Cisplatinc Ā Cisplatind

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)Ā 
Ā  Nausea 93 25 2 87 Ā 20 <1
Ā  Vomiting 78Ā  11Ā  12Ā  71 10 9Ā 
Ā  Alopecia 53 1Ā  0 33 0Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Neuro Motor 35Ā  12 0 15 3 0Ā 
Ā  Diarrhea 24Ā  2 2 13 0 0Ā 
Ā  Neuro SensoryĀ  23 1 0 18 1 0Ā 
Ā  Infection 18 3 2 12 1 0Ā 
Ā  Fever 16 0 0 5 0Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Neuro CorticalĀ  16 3 1 9 1 0Ā 
Ā  Neuro MoodĀ  16 1 0 10 1 0Ā 

Ā  Local
15 0 0 6 0 0Ā 
Ā  Neuro Headache 14 0 0 7 0 0Ā 
Ā  Stomatitis 14 1 0 5 0 0Ā 
Ā  Hemorrhage 14 1 0 4 0 0Ā 
Ā  Hypotension 12 1 0 7 1Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Rash 11 0 0 3Ā  0Ā  0Ā 
aGrade based on National Cancer Institute CTC.Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
b Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related.Ā 

C N=217-253; all gemcitabine / cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.

d N=213-248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Table 12: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ā‰„5% (All Grades) or ā‰„2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 3a
Ā Laboratory Abnormalityb Ā Gemcitabine/Cisplatinc Ā Cisplatind

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)Ā 

All Grades

(%)

Grade 3

(%)

Grade 4

(%)
Hematologic
Ā  AnemiaĀ  89 22 3 67 6 1
Ā  ThrombocytopeniaĀ  85 25Ā  25Ā  13 3Ā  1
Ā  NeutropeniaĀ  79 22Ā  35Ā  20 3Ā  1
Ā  LymphopeniaĀ  75 25Ā  18Ā  51 12Ā  5
Ā  RBC TransfusioneĀ  39 -Ā  - 13Ā  - -
Ā  Platelet Transfusionse 21 -Ā  -Ā  <1 - -
HepaticĀ 
Ā  Increased TransaminaseĀ  22 2 1 10 1 0
Ā  Increased Alkaline Phosphatase 19Ā  1 0 13 0 0
RenalĀ 
Ā  Increased CreatinineĀ  38 4 <1 31 2 <1
Ā  ProteinuriaĀ  23 0 0 18 0 0
Ā  Hematuria 15 0Ā  0 13 0 0
Other LaboratoryĀ 
Ā  HyperglycemiaĀ  30Ā  4 0 23 3 0
Ā  HypomagnesemiaĀ  30Ā  4Ā  3Ā  17 2 0
Ā  Hypocalcemia 18Ā  0Ā  0 7 0 <1

a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC. b Regardless of causality. c N=217-253; all gemcitabine/cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. d N=213-248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. e Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Percent transfusions are not CTC-graded events.

Tables 13 and 14 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ā‰„10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 4) of gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=69) administered in 21-day cycles as compared to etoposide with cisplatin (n=66) in patients receiving ļ¬rst-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. Additional clinically signiļ¬cant adverse reactions are provided following Table 14.

Patients in the gemcitabine cisplatin (GC) arm received a median of 5 cycles and those in the etoposide/cisplatin (EC) arm received a median of 4 cycles. The majority of patients receiving more than one cycle of treatment required dose adjustments; 81% in the GC arm and 68% in the EC arm. The incidence of hospitalizations for adverse reactions was 22% in the GC arm and 27% in the EC arm. The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment for adverse reactions was higher in the GC arm (14% versus 8%). The proportion of patients who were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia was lower in the GC arm (7% versus 12%). There was one death attributed to treatment, a patient with febrile neutropenia and renal failure, which occurred in the GC arm.

Table 13: Selected Adverse Reactions in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4a
Adverse Reactionsb Ā Gemcitabine / Cisplatinc Ā Ā Etoposide / Cisplatind

All Grades (%)

Grade 3 (%)

Grade 4 (%)Ā 
All Grades (%)
Grade 3 (%)

Grade 4 (%)
Ā  Nausea and Vomiting 96 35 4 86 19 7
Ā  Alopecia 77 13 0Ā  92Ā  51 0Ā 
Ā  Paresthesias 38 0 0Ā  16Ā  2Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Infection 28 3 1Ā  21Ā  8Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Stomatitis 20 4 0Ā  18 2Ā  0Ā 

Ā  Diarrhea
14 1Ā  1Ā  13Ā  0 2Ā 
Ā  Edemae 12 -Ā  -Ā  2Ā  -Ā  -Ā 
Ā  Rash 10 0Ā  0Ā  3Ā  0Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Hemorrhage 9 0Ā  3Ā  3Ā  0Ā  3Ā 
Ā  Fever 6 0Ā  0Ā  3Ā  0Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Somnolence 3 0Ā  0Ā  3Ā  2Ā  0Ā 
Ā  Flu-like syndromee 3 - - 0Ā  -Ā  -Ā 
Ā  Dyspnea 1Ā  0Ā  1 3Ā  0Ā  0Ā 

a Grade based on criteria from WHO. Ā  Ā 

b Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. Pain data were not collected.

c N=67-69; all gemcitabine / cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.

d N=57-63; all cisplatin / etoposide patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.

e Flu-like syndrome and edema were not graded.

Table 14: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4a
Laboratory Abnormalityb Ā Gemcitabine/Cisplatinc Ā Etoposide/Cisplatind

All Grades (%)
Ā Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%)
All Grades (%)
Grade 3 (%) Grade 4 (%)
Hematologic
Ā Ā  Anemia 88 22 0 77 13 2
Ā Ā  Neutropenia 88 36 28 87 20 56
Ā Ā  Thrombocytopenia 81 39 16 45 8 5
Ā Ā  RBC Transfusione 29 -Ā  - 21 - -
Ā Ā  Platelet Transfusione 3 -Ā  - 8 -Ā  -

Hepatic

Ā  Increased Alkaline
Ā Ā  Phosphatase 16 0 0 11 0Ā  0
Ā Ā  Increased ALT 6 0 0 12 0Ā  0
Ā Ā  Increased AST 3 0 0 11 0Ā  0
Renal
Ā Ā  Hematuria 22 0 0 10 0 0
Ā Ā  Proteinuria 12 0 0 5 0 0
Ā Ā  Increased BUN 6 0 0 4 0 0
Ā Ā  Increased Creatinine 2 0 0 2 0 0

aĀ Grade based on criteria from WHO. b Regardless of causality. c N=67-69; all gemcitabine/cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. d N=57-63; all etoposide/cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data. e Percent of patients receiving transfusions. WHO Grading scale not applicable to proportion patients with transfusions.

6.2 Postmarketing Experience


The following adverse reactions have been identiļ¬ed during post-approval use of gemcitabine. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Blood and Lymphatic System: TMA Cardiovascular: Congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, supraventricular arrhythmias. Vascular: Peripheral vasculitis, gangrene, capillary leak syndrome. Skin: Cellulitis, pseudocellulitis, severe skin reactions, including desquamation and bullous skin eruptions. Hepatic: Hepatic failure, hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Pulmonary: Interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary ļ¬brosis, pulmonary eosinophilia, pulmonary edema, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) Nervous System: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)

8. Use In Specific Populations



Lactation: Advise not to breastfeed. (8.2)

8.1 Pregnancy


Risk Summary Based on animal data and its mechanism of action, Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.1)]. There are no available data on the use of gemcitabine in pregnant women. In animal reproduction studies, gemcitabine was teratogenic, embryotoxic, and fetotoxic in mice and rabbits (see Data). Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus [see Use in Speciļ¬c Populations (8.3)].In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriages in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively.

Data Animal Data Gemcitabine is embryotoxic in mice. Daily dosing of gemcitabine to pregnant mice increased the incidence of fetal malformations (cleft palate, incomplete ossiļ¬cation) at doses of 1.5 mg/kg/day [about0.005 times the 1000 mg/mĀ² clinical dose based on body surface area (BSA)]. Gemcitabine is embryotoxic and fetotoxic in rabbits. Daily dosing of gemcitabine to pregnant rabbits resulted in fetotoxicity (decreased fetal viability, reduced litter sizes and developmental delays) and increased the incidence of fetal malformations (fused pulmonary artery, absence of gall bladder) at doses of 0.1 mg/kg/day (about 0.002 times the 1000 mg/mĀ² clinical dose based on BSA).

8.2 Lactation


Risk Summary There is no information regarding the presence of gemcitabine or its metabolites in human milk, or their effects on the breastfed infant or on milk production. Due to the potential for serious adverse reactions in breastfed infants, advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for at least one week following the last dose.

8.3 Females and Males of Reproductive Potential


Pregnancy Testing Verify pregnancy status in females of reproductive potential prior to initiating Gemcitabine Injection [see Use in Speciļ¬c Populations (8.1)].

Contraception Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman [see Use in Speciļ¬c Populations (8.1)].

Females Because of the potential for genotoxicity, advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 6 months after the ļ¬nal dose.

Males Because of the potential for genotoxicity, advise males with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 3 months after the ļ¬nal dose [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].

Infertility Males Based on animal studies, gemcitabine may impair fertility in males of reproductive potential [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)]. It is not known whether these effects on fertility are reversible.

8.4 Pediatric Use


The safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine have not been established in pediatric patients.

The safety and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine were evaluated in a trial in pediatric patients with refractory leukemia.

The maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg/mĀ²/min for 360 minutes weekly for three weeks followed by a one-week rest period.

The safety and activity of gemcitabine were evaluated in a trial of pediatric patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (22 patients) and acute myelogenous leukemia (10 patients) at a dose of10 mg/mĀ²/min administered over 360 minutes weekly for three weeks followed by a one-week rest period.

Patients with M1 or M2 bone marrow on Day 28 who did not experience unacceptable toxicity were eligible to receive a maximum of one additional four-week course. Toxicities observed included myelosuppression, febrile neutropenia, increased serum transaminases, nausea, and rash/desquamation. No meaningful clinical activity was observed in this trial.

8.5 Geriatric Use


In clinical studies which enrolled 979 patients with various malignancies who received single agent gemcitabine, no overall differences in safety were observed between patients aged 65 and older and younger patients, with the exception of a higher rate of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in older patients as compared to younger patients.

In a randomized trial in women with ovarian cancer (Study 1), 175 women received gemcitabine with carboplatin, of which 29% were age 65 years or older. Similar effectiveness was observed between older and younger women. There was signiļ¬cantly higher Grade 3-4 neutropenia in women 65 years of age or older [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)].

Gemcitabine clearance is affected by age, however there are no recommended dose adjustments based on patients' age [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

8.6 Gender


Gemcitabine clearance is decreased in females [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. In single agent studies of gemcitabine, women, especially older women, were more likely not to proceed to a subsequent cycle and to experience Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia [see Dosage and Administration (2.1,2.2, 2.3, 2.4)].

10 Overdosage


There is no known antidote for overdoses of gemcitabine. Myelosuppression, paresthesias, and severe rash were the principal toxicities seen when a single dose as high as 5700 mg/mĀ² was administered by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes every 2 weeks to several patients in a dose-escalation study. In the event of suspected overdose, monitor with appropriate blood counts and provide supportive therapy, as necessary.

11 Description


Gemcitabine is a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor. The chemical name of gemcitabine HCl is 2Ā“- deoxy-2Ā“, 2Ā“diļ¬‚uorocytidine monohydrochloride (Ī²-isomer).

The structural formula is as follows:



Gemcitabine HCl is a white to off-white solid with a molecular formula of C9H11F2N3O4 ā€¢ HCl and a molecular weight of 299.66 g/mol. It is soluble in water, slightly soluble in methanol, and practically insoluble in ethanol and polar organic solvents.

Gemcitabine Injection is a sterile solution in single-dose vials for intravenous use. Each vial contains 200 mg, 1 g, or 2 g of gemcitabine equivalent to 227.7 mg, 1.139 g,or 2.277 g of gemcitabine HCl. Each mL contains 38 mg of gemcitabine free base in Water for Injection, USP equivalent to 43.27 mg of gemcitabine HCl. Hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide may have been added for pH adjustment.

12 Clinical Pharmacology


12.1 Mechanism of Action


Gemcitabine kills cells undergoing DNA synthesis and blocks the progression of cells through the G1/S-phase boundary. Gemcitabine is metabolized by nucleoside kinases to diphosphate (dFdCDP) and triphosphate (dFdCTP) nucleosides. Gemcitabine diphosphate inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, an enzyme responsible for catalyzing the reactions that generate deoxynucleoside triphosphates for DNA synthesis, resulting in reductions in deoxynucleotide concentrations, including dCTP. Gemcitabine triphosphate competes with dCTP for incorporation into DNA. The reduction in the intracellular concentration of dCTP by the action of the diphosphate enhances the incorporation of gemcitabine triphosphate into DNA (self-potentiation). After the gemcitabine nucleotide is incorporated into DNA, only one additional nucleotide is added to the growing DNA strands which eventually results in the initiation of apoptotic cell death.

12.3 Pharmacokinetics


The pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine were examined in 353 patients, with various solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using data from patients treated for varying durations of therapy given weekly with periodic rest weeks and using both short infusions (<70 minutes) and long infusions (70 to 285 minutes). The total gemcitabine dose varied from 500 mg/mĀ² to 3600 mg/mĀ².

Distribution The volume of distribution was increased with infusion length. Volume of distribution of gemcitabine was 50 L/mĀ² following infusions lasting <70 minutes. For long infusions, the volume of distribution rose to 370 L/mĀ².

Gemcitabine pharmacokinetics are linear and are described by a 2-compartment model. Population pharmacokinetic analyses of combined single and multiple dose studies showed that the volume of distribution of gemcitabine was signiļ¬cantly inļ¬‚uenced by duration of infusion and sex. Gemcitabine plasma protein binding is negligible.

Elimination Metabolism The active metabolite, gemcitabine triphosphate, can be extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The half-life of the terminal phase for gemcitabine triphosphate from mononuclear cells ranges from 1.7 to 19.4 hours.

Excretion Gemcitabine disposition was studied in 5 patients who received a single 1000 mg/mĀ² of radiolabeled drug as a 30-minute infusion. Within one (1) week, 92% to 98% of the dose was recovered, almost entirely in the urine. Gemcitabine (<10%) and the inactive uracil metabolite, 2Ā“-deoxy-2Ā“,2Ā“-diļ¬‚uorouridine (dFdU), accounted for 99% of the excreted dose. The metabolite dFdU is also found in plasma.

Speciļ¬c Populations Geriatric Patients Clearance of gemcitabine was affected by age. The lower clearance in geriatric patients results in higher concentrations of gemcitabine for any given dose. Differences in either clearance or volume of distribution based on patient characteristics or the duration of infusion result in changes in half-life and plasma concentrations. Table 15 shows plasma clearance and half-life of gemcitabine following short infusions for typical patients by age and sex.

Gemcitabine half-life for short infusions ranged from 42 to 94 minutes, and for long infusions varied from 245 to 638 minutes, depending on age and sex, reļ¬‚ecting a greatly increased volume of distribution with longer infusions.

Male and Female Patients Females have lower clearance and longer half-lives than male patients as described in Table 15.

Table 15: Gemcitabine Clearance and Half-Life for the ā€œTypicalā€ Patient
Age
Clearance

Men

(L/hr/m2)

Clearance

Women

(L/hr/m2)

Half-Lifea

Men

(min)

Half-Lifea

Women

(min)
29 92.2 69.4 42 49
45 75.7 57 48 57
65 55.1 41.5 61 73
79 40.7 30.7 79 94
a Half ā€“life for Patients receiving <70 minute infusion.

Patients with Renal Impairment No clinical studies have been conducted with gemcitabine in patients with decreased renal function.

Patients with Hepatic Impairment No clinical studies have been conducted with gemcitabine in patients with decreased hepatic function.

Drug Interaction Studies When gemcitabine (1250 mg/mĀ² on Days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/mĀ² on Day 1) were administered in patients with NSCLC, the clearance of gemcitabine on Day 1 was 128 L/hr/mĀ² and on Day 8 was 107 L/hr/mĀ². Data from patients with NSCLC demonstrate that gemcitabine and carboplatin given in combination does not alter the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine or carboplatin compared to administration of either single agent, however, due to wide conļ¬dence intervals and small sample size, interpatient variability may be observed.

Data from patients with metastatic breast cancer shows that gemcitabine has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics (clearance and half-life) of paclitaxel and paclitaxel has little or no effect on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine.

13 Nonclinical Toxicology


13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility


Long-term animal studies to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of gemcitabine have not been conducted. Gemcitabine was mutagenic in an in vitro mouse lymphoma (L5178Y) assay and was clastogenic in an in vivo mouse micronucleus assay. Gemcitabine intraperitoneal doses of 0.5 mg/kg/day (about 1/700 the 1000 mg/mĀ² clinical dose based on BSA) in male mice resulted in moderate to severe hypospermatogenesis, decreased fertility, and decreased implantations. In female mice, fertility was not affected but maternal toxicities were observed at 1.5 mg/kg/day administered intravenously (about 1/200 the 1000 mg/mĀ² clinical dose based on BSA) and fetotoxicity or embryolethality was observed at 0.25 mg/kg/day administered intravenously (about 1/1300 the 1000 mg/mĀ² clinical dose based on BSA).

14 Clinical Studies


14.1 Ovarian Cancer


The efļ¬cacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in a randomized trial (Study 1) conducted in women with advanced ovarian cancer that had relapsed at least 6 months after ļ¬rst-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/mĀ² on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with carboplatin AUC 4 on Day 1 after gemcitabine administration (n = 178) or carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n = 178). The major efļ¬cacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS).

A total of 356 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics are shown in Table 16. Efļ¬cacy results are presented in Table 17 and Figure 1. The addition of gemcitabine to carboplatin resulted in statistically signiļ¬cant improvements in PFS and overall response rate. Approximately 75% of patients in each arm received additional chemotherapy for disease progression; 13 of 120 patients in the carboplatin alone arm received gemcitabine for treatment of disease progression. There was no signiļ¬cant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms.

Table 16: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Study 1

Gemcitabine/Carboplatin

(N=178)

Carboplatin

(N=178)

Median age, years

59

58

Range

36 to 78

21 to 81

Baseline ECOG performance status 0-1a

94%

95%

Disease Status

Ā  Evaluable

Ā  Bidimensionally measurable

8%

92%

3%

96%

Platinum-free intervalb

Ā  6-12 months

Ā  >12 months

40%

59%

40%

60%

First-line therapy

Ā  Platinum-taxane combination

Ā  Platinum-non-taxane combination

Ā  Platinum monotherapy

70%

29%

1%

71%

28%

1%

aĀ 5 patients on gemcitabine/carboplatin arm and 4 patients on carboplatin arm had no baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)Ā performance status. bĀ 2 patients on gemcitabine/carboplatin arm and 1 patient on carboplatin arm had platinum-free interval <6 months.

Table 17: Efļ¬cacy Results in Study 1
Efficacy Parameter
Gemcitabine/Carboplatin

(N=178)

Carboplatin

(N=178)

Progression Free Survival

Median (95% CIa.) in months

8.6 (8.0, 9.7)

5.8 (5.2, 7.1)

Ā  Hazard Ratio (95% CI.)

0.72 (0.57, 0.90)

p=valueb

p=0.0038

Overall Survival

Median (95% CI.) months

18.0

(16.2, 20.3)
17.3
(15.2, 19.3)Ā 
Hazard Ratio (95% CI.) 0.98 (0.78, 1.24)Ā 
p=valueb Ā p=0.8977
Overall Response Rate by Investigator Review Ā 47.2% 30.9%Ā 

p=valuec

p=0.0016

CRd

PR+ with PRNMe

14.6%

32.6%

6.2%

24.7%

Overall Response Rate by Independent Reviewf

46.3%

35.6%

p=valuec

p=0.11

CRd

PR+ with PRNMe

9.1%

37.2%

4%

31.7%

aĀ CI=confidence interval. b Log rank, unadjusted. c Chi square. d CR=Complete response e PR plus PRNM=Partial response plus partial response, non-measurable disease f Independently reviewed cohort - Gemcitabine/carboplatin (n=121), carboplatin (n=101); independent reviewers unable to measure disease detected by sonography or physical exam.

Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Progression_Free Survival in Study 1



14.2 Breast Cancer


The efļ¬cacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in a multinational, randomized, open-label trial conducted in women receiving initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer and who have received prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy unless clinically contraindicated.

Patients were randomized to receive gemcitabine 1250 mg/mĀ² on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with paclitaxel 175 mg/mĀ² administered on Day 1 before gemcitabine administration (n = 267) or paclitaxel 175 mg/mĀ² on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (n = 262). The major efļ¬cacy outcome measure was time to documented disease progression.

A total of 529 patients were enrolled. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms (Table 18). Efļ¬cacy results are presented in Table 19 and Figure 2. The addition of gemcitabine to paclitaxel resulted in statistically signiļ¬cant improvement in time to documented disease progression and overall response rate compared to paclitaxel alone. There was no signiļ¬cant difference in overall survival.

Table 18: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Study 2
Gemcitabine/Paclitaxel (N=267) Paclitaxel (N=267)
Median age, years 53 52
RangeĀ  26 to 83 26 to 75
Metastatic diseaseĀ  97% 97%
Baseline KPSa ā‰„90 70% 74%
Number of tumor sites
Ā  1 - 2 57% 59%
Ā  ā‰„3 43% 41%
Visceral disease 73% 73%
Prior anthracycline 97% 96%

a Karnofsky Performance Status.

Table 19: Efļ¬cacy Results in Study 2

Efficacy Parameter

Gemcitabine/Paclitaxel

(N=267)

Paclitaxel

(N=267)

Time to Documented Disease Progressiona

Median (95%, CI.) in months

5.2

(4.2, 5.6)

2.9

(2.6, 3.7)

Hazard Ratio (95%, CI.)

0.650 (0.524, 0.805)

p-value

p<0.0001

Overall Survivalb

Median (95% CI) in months

18.6

(16.5, 20.7)

15.8

(14.1, 17.3)

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

0.86 (0.71, 1.04)

p-value

Not significant

Overall Response Rateb

(95% CI)

p-value

40.8% (34.9, 46.7)

22.1% (17.1, 27.2)

p<0.0001

aĀ These represent reconciliation of investigator and Independent Review Committee assessments according to a predeļ¬ned algorithm. b Based on the ITT population.

Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Time to Documented Disease Progression in Study 2



14.3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer


The efļ¬cacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in two randomized, multicenter trials.

Study 3: 28-Day Schedule A multinational, randomized trial (Study 3) compared gemcitabine with cisplatin to cisplatin alone in the treatment of patients with inoperable Stage IIIA, IIIB, or IV NSCLC who had not received prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/mĀ² on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/mĀ² on Day 1 after gemcitabine administration (N=260) or cisplatin 100 mg/mĀ² on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle (N=262). The major efļ¬cacy outcome measure was overall survival.

A total of 522 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics (Table 20) were similar between arms with the exception of histologic subtype of NSCLC, with 48% of patients on the cisplatin arm and 37% of patients on the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm having adenocarcinoma.

Efļ¬cacy results are presented in Table 21 and Figure 3.

Study 4: 21-Day Schedule A randomized (1:1), multicenter trial (Study 4) was conducted in patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive gemcitabine 1250 mg/mĀ² on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/mĀ² on Day 1 after gemcitabine administration or etoposide 100 mg/mĀ² intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 with cisplatin 100 mg/mĀ² on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The major efļ¬cacy outcome measure was response rate.

A total of 135 patients were enrolled. Demographics and baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 20.

Efļ¬cacy results are presented in Table 21. There was no signiļ¬cant difference in survival between the two treatment arms. The median survival was 8.7 months for the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm versus 7 months for the etoposide with cisplatin arm. Median time to disease progression for the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm was 5 months compared to 4.1 months on the etoposide with cisplatin arm (Log rank p=0.015, two-sided). The objective response rate for the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm was 33% compared to 14% on the etoposide with cisplatin arm (Fisher's Exact p=0.01, two-sided).

Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival in Study 3



Table 20: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Studies 3 and 4

Trial

28-day Schedule (Study 3)

21-day Schedule (Study 4)

Gemcitabine /

Cisplatin (N=260)

Cisplatin

(N=262)

Gemcitabine /

Cisplatin (N=69)

Etoposide /

Cisplatin (N=66)

Male

Median age, years

Range

70%

62

36 to 88

71%

63

35 to 79

93%

58

33 to 76

92%

60

35 to 75

Stage IIIA

Stage IIIB

Stage IV

7%

26%

67%

7%

23%

70%

N/Ac

48%

52%

N/Ac

52%

49%

Baseline KPSb 70 to 80

Baseline KPSb 90 to 100

41%

57%

44%

55%

45%

55%

52%

49%

a N/A Not applicable. b Karnofsky Performance Status.

Table 21: Efļ¬cacy Results for Studies 3 and 4
Trial 28-day Schedule (Study 3) 21-day Schedule (Study 4)

Efficacy Parameter

Gemcitabine / Cisplatin (N=260)

Cisplatin (N=262)

Gemcitabine / Cisplatin (N=69)

Etoposide / Cisplatin (N=66)

Survival

Median, months

(95% CIa) months

9.0

8.2, 11.0

7.6

6.6, 8.8

8.7

7.8, 10.1

7.0

6.0, 9.7

p-valueb

p=0.008

p=0.18

Time to Disease

Progression

Median in months

(95% CIe) months

5.2

4.2, 5.7

3.7

3.0, 4.3

5.0

4.2, 6.4

4.1

2.4, 4.5

p-valueb

p=0.009

p=0.015

Tumor Response

26%

10%

33%

14%

p-valuef

p<0.0001

p=0.01

aĀ CI= conļ¬dence intervals. b p-value two-sided Fisher's Exact test for difference in binomial proportions; log rank test for time-to-event analysis.

14.4 Pancreatic Cancer


The efļ¬cacy of gemcitabine was evaluated in two trials (Studies 5 and 6), a randomized, single-blind, two-arm, activecontrolled trial (Study 5) conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy and in a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial (Study 6) conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with ļ¬‚uorouracil or a ļ¬‚uorouracil-containing regimen. In Study 5, patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by a one-week rest, then once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 28-days in subsequent cycles (n=63) or ļ¬‚uorouracil 600 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly (n=63). In Study 6, all patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/mĀ² intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by a one-week rest, then once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 28-days in subsequent cycles.

The major efļ¬cacy outcome measure in both trials was ā€œclinical beneļ¬t responseā€. A patient was considered to have had a clinical beneļ¬t response if either of the following occurred:
  • The patient achieved a ā‰„50% reduction in pain intensity (Memorial Pain Assessment Card) or analgesic consumption, or a 20-point or greater improvement in performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status) for a period of at least 4 consecutive weeks, without showing any sustained worsening in any of the other parameters. Sustained worsening was deļ¬ned as 4 consecutive weeks with either any increase in pain intensity or analgesic consumption or a 20-point decrease in performance status occurring during the ļ¬rst 12 weeks of therapy.

ORĀ 
  • The patient was stable on all of the aforementioned parameters, and showed a marked, sustained weight gain (ā‰„7% increase maintained for ā‰„4 weeks) not due to ļ¬‚uid accumulation.

Study 5 enrolled 126 patients. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the arms (Table 22).

The efļ¬cacy results are shown in Table 23 and Figure 4. Patients treated with gemcitabine had statistically signiļ¬cant increases in clinical beneļ¬t response, survival, and time to disease progression compared to those randomized to receive ļ¬‚uorouracil. No conļ¬rmed objective tumor responses were observed in either treatment arm.

Table 22: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Study 5
Gemcitabine (N=63) Fluorouracil (N=63)
Ā  Male 54% 54%
Median age 62 years 61 years
Ā Ā Range 37 to 79 36 to 77
Stage IV disease 71% 76%
Baseline KPSa ā‰¤70 70% 68%

a Karnofsky Performance Status.

Table 23: Efļ¬cacy Results in Study 5

Efficacy Parameter

Gemcitabine (N=63)

Fluorouracil (N=63)

Clinical benefit response

p-valuea

22.2%

4.8%

p=0.004

Overall Survival

Median (95% CI.) in months

p-valueb

5.7 (4.7, 6.9)

4.2 (3.1, 5.1)

p=0.0009

Time to Disease Progression

Median (95% CI) in months

p-valueb

2.1 (1.9, 3.4)

0.9 (0.9, 1.1)

p=0.0013
a Karnofsky Performance Status.Ā 

a p-value for clinical beneļ¬t response calculated using the two-sided test for difference in binomial proportions. All other p-values are calculated using log rank test.

Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival in Study 5



15 References


1 OSHA Hazardous Drugs. ā€OSHA. http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hazardousdrugs/index.html

16 How Supplied/storage And Handling


Gemcitabine Injection is available in sterile single-dose vials individually packaged in a carton as follows:
  • 2 g/52.6 mL (38 mg/mL), sterile solution in a single-dose glass vial per package, NDC 72485-223-20

Store at 2Ā° to 8Ā°C (36Ā° to 46Ā°F). Do not freeze.

Gemcitabine Injection is a cytotoxic drug. Follow applicable special handling and disposal procedures.Ā¹

17 Patient Counseling Information


Myelosuppression

Advise patients of the risks of myelosuppression. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider should any signs or symptoms of infection, including fever, or if bleeding, or signs of anemia, occur [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

Pulmonary Toxicity

Advise patients of the risks of pulmonary toxicity including respiratory failure and death. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for development of shortness of breath, wheezing, or cough [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome and Renal Failure

Advise patients of the risks of hemolytic uremic syndrome and associated renal failure. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for changes in the color or volume of urine output or for increased bruising or bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)].

Hepatic Toxicity

Advise patients of the risks of hepatic toxicity including liver failure and death. Instruct patients to immediately contact their healthcare provider for signs of jaundice or for pain/tenderness in the right upper abdominal quadrant [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5)].

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Advise females and males of reproductive potential that Gemcitabine Injection can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 6 months after the ļ¬nal dose. Advise male patients with female partners of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for 3 months after the ļ¬nal dose [see Warnings and Precaution (5.6), Use in Speciļ¬c Populations (8.1, 8.3)].

Lactation

Advise women not to breastfeed during treatment with Gemcitabine Injection and for at least one week after the last dose [see Use in Speciļ¬c Populations (8.2)].

Infertility

Advise males of reproductive potential of the potential for reduced fertility with Gemcitabine Injection [see Use in Speciļ¬c Populations (8.3), Nonclinical Toxicology (13.1)].

Manufactured by Shilpa Medicare Limited,Jadcherla-509301, INDIA

Distributed by: Armas Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Manalapan, NJ 07726 (USA)

Revised: 08/2019

Packaging




DISCLAIMER:

"This tool does not provide medical advice, and is for informational and educational purposes only, and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, treatment or diagnosis. Call your doctor to receive medical advice. If you think you may have a medical emergency, please dial 911."

"Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated. We may limit or otherwise restrict your access to the API in line with our Terms of Service."

"This product uses publicly available data from the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services; NLM is not responsible for the product and does not endorse or recommend this or any other product."

PillSync may earn a commission via links on our site